About Me

Name: Armanius
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

DailyKos liberals' vicious attacks against Palin

Once again, the lunatics at DailyKos show their hypocrisy. The self-proclaimed champions of women's rights have been denegrading Gov. Palin's accomplishments all day long making sexist remarks, and even suggesting that Palin's 4 month old down-syndrome baby is really the son of Palin's teenage daughter. DailyKos bloggers argue that this will the Republican's "Edwards Scandal." Can you believe this trash? It's so ironic how the left accuses conservatives of being "hatemongers" when in fact liberals are the REAL hatemongers. They talk about freedom of speech, equal rights, and civil liberties. But apparently those rights only applies to other liberals.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama: America is as bad as Russia

Obama makes me ill. I have not accused Obama of being "unpatriotic" or "un-American" yet. But the more I hear him talk, the more I can't help but to think that his relativist view of good and evil will take our country down a path of appeasement and moral decay that we may never recover from. In a speech made in front of Virginia supporters two days ago, Obama not only compared but equated the Russian invasion of Georgia with the war in Iraq. Obama rebuked Russia and then said that America has not set a good example. Last I remember, Georgia's President Mikheil Saakashvili wasn't murderning thousands of Kurds and political opponents. Saakashvili wasn't under a mandate to cooperate with U.N. inspectors about dismantling its weapons of mass destruction program. Saakashvili wasn't talking tough about how he has some surprises in waiting for anyone that challenges him. Saakashvili wasn't paying off U.N. with the oil for food program. Is Obama ignorant, an idiot, intellectually dishonest, a liar, misguided, or just a fool? Maybe he's all of the above. Did Obama forget that Saddam wasn't a very nice guy? Or as John McCain said in the 2004 Republican Convention, Saddam wasn't exactly running an "oasis of peace" in Iraq. This idea of relativism that Obama and so many liberals have is just simply appaling. There is no right and wrong. There isn't good and evil. Maybe that's why Obama said that we must "confront" evil when Rick Warren asked whether we should ignore, negotiate with, contain or defeat evil. Note that Pastor Warren did not give Obama the choice of "confronting" evil. Obama decided on confronting, because the word confronting is totally open ended and ambiguous. Confronting can mean stepping in front of evil and attempting to stop it. Confronting can also mean pointing it out by saying "look, there's bad guy there." Or confronting could just simply be telling evil, "you are being bad." Obama has no moral core. He has not set values. And a lot of liberals like Obama's ideology and value system (or the lack thereof), because they find the idea of relativism a great way to validate their own lifestyle. Liberals want to do whatever they please and not have anyone preach to them about consequences. After all, who are we to preach about what is right and wrong. That's what Obama says. And liberals just love that.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Liberals and Moral Relativism

Fictitious standard of morality. That's what a former Jesse Jackson advisor named Ronald Walters said tonight in Hannity & Colmes, while arguing that a presidential candidate's moral values are not relevant. Walters said that infidelity is not something to really dwell into, because no one knows all the "circumstances" surrounding the infidelity. In other words, Walters believe that there are situations in which infidelity is excused depending on the circumstances. Walters was responding to Sean Hannity's argument that if a husband (i.e. John Edwards) cannot keep his vows to his wife, then why should voters believe what that unfaithful husband says?
 
Alan Colmes then turned the question around to conservative guest Amanda Carpenter, and started saying that McCain cannot be trusted, because he himself admitted that he had cheated on his first wife thirty years ago. Colmes kept asking if there was any difference between McCain and Edwards. Carpenter didn't have a good response, but I do. I doubt that Colmes will ever read my blog, but I am going to write it anyway.
 
First of all, let me make this clear -- I believe that infidelity is wrong. There are no excuses. There is nothing that justifies the breaking of a sacred vow. And in that sense, I do believe that men like McCain and Edwards committed sins, and need to be closely scrutinized to see if they are indeed people who will hold on to promises that they make.
 
That being said, Edwards' infidelity goes beyond just pure sexual indiscredtion or a momentary lapse of judgment. Edwards not only broke his promise to his wife, but then he lied to cover it up. He lied repeatedly and only came clean when he was trapped. To cover up the infidelity, Edwards has broken several campaign finance and tax laws by paying off his mistress Rillie Hunter as well as Andrew Young, Edwards' former campaign aide (and alleged friend)/  Young took the fall for Edwards by claiming that the mistress' baby was his. Edwards obviously did not care about Young, or else he would not have asked him to take the fall. Edwards fathered a child, and was/is perfectly willing to abandon that child to the life of single parenthood. Last but not least, Edwards campaigned for president under the banner of "moral values." He is not only a cheater, and liar. He is also a hypocrite.
 
If McCain also engaged in an elaborate law breaking cover up scheme of his infidelity and child abandonment, then I'd harp about McCain too.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (3) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (1) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Blogging in the DailyKos - Part 3

In my venture into the darkness of the DailyKos, there are all these bloggers there that are blaming the current war in Georgia on Bush and Cheney. They equate Bush with Putin, and argue that Russia is justified to invade Georgia for the purposes of regime change, because that's what Bush did with Iraq. Bush has been equated with Stalin, Hitler, and is often called a murdere, liar, etc. While I may not agree with all of President Bush's policy, I fail to understand the lunacy of some of the bloggers in the DailyKos. We all live in the same country, and yet, how can our views diverge so much to the point that I feel like I am reading to blogs from a bunch of people who hate the United States of America. Scary.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Should Townhall ban liberals who blog in Townhall?

I personally do not believe that Townhall should ban anyone, as long as the posts are civil. But I do think that Townhall ought to remove the feature where a blogger can "turn off" the comments. Certain liberal bloggers like the oxymorinic "American 4 Truth" enjoy blogging in Townhall, but are too afraid to allow others to post rebuttals to their blogs. So they keep the comments feature on "off." Go to liberal sites like DailyKos and anyone who does not share their beliefs gets banned. No civility. No debating. Only cursing, berating, and banishment.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (21) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Blogging in the DailyKos - Part 2

Was Savage right in saying that liberalism is an illness? Talk about a group of people who do not know how to be civil to people who do not share their opinions!!! I don't know if all the people who write in the DailyKos are like that, but I certainly ran into a group that are darn close to being like a crazed weasel!!! If I had been in a room with them, they would have probably lynched me. It's the irony of liberalism. Give terrorists access to our civilian court system. Give terrorists all the civil rights that Americans enjoy. Let's embrace freedom of speech (except when it is related to Christianity). But at the same, the liberals want to censor all the Americans that do not share their view. They demonize anyone who doesn't share their beliefs. They threaten and curse those that dare to think differently. That's my experience so far in the DailyKos. I'll provide more details later on, assuming that I don't get banned as I have already been threatened with!

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Blogging in DailyKos - Part 1

I began a blog in the DailyKos over the weekend, after being inspired by some of the people at Townhall.com. I noted that we have a few left wing radicals who like to blog in Townhall (with the comments feature turned off, of course, to prevent rebuttals), as well as post comments in our blogs that are sometimes filled with some very hateful messages. Nevertheless, I believe that people should voice their opinions, and people should listen. Civility is always nice, but obviously, some individuals on the left have large amounts of angst. So as I begin my journey in the dark side known as the DailyKos, I'll keep you posted of the types of reaction that I get there. If the liberals in DailyKos are really the champions of freedom of speech and individual rights (as liberals like to tout themselves), they will welcome a good debate. Otherwise, I suppose my account will get banned pretty quickly.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

American 4 Truth? Liberals and censorship

I wonder why our fellow Town Hall blogger "American 4 Truth" will not allow people to post comments on his blog?
I believe all of us are entitled to our opinions and views, even if we are not all in agreement. That's what makes America the great nation that it is. Instead, liberals who profess to be the champions of freedom of speech and civil rights often act more like McCarthy than MLK. That's why several Dems in Congress want to bring back the "fairness" doctrine to silence conservative talk shows. That's why criticism of Obama is labeled as "ignorant" or "racist" or "divisive" or "scare tactics." That's why conservative rhetoric in Hollywood is almost synonimous to career suicide. That's why the liberal main stream media selectively highlights "scandalous gotchas" about conservatives while exercising "journalist due diligence" when it comes to liberals. That's why Pelosi turned off the cameras and the lights on her fellow representatives in the House. C'mon liberals, if y'all are truly for freedom of speech, why do y'all like to shut up all the people who do not share your views??
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Hollywood Conservatives - there is hope after all!

The Weekly Standard has a great and encouraging article discussing Hollywood conservatism  in the context of producer David Zucker’s upcoming movie “An American Carol.” In the article, Zucker discusses his journey from left to right, with the ultimate turning point being 9/11. It is a great article that makes me think there is hope for Hollywood after all.
 
"An American Carol" satirizes the turning to the right of a liberal movie director after the he is visited by the ghosts of George Washington, George Patton and JFK. The movie stars Kevin Farley as the Michael Moore look-a-like character, and also Kelsey Grammer, Dennis Hopper, Jon Voight, and James Woods. Zucker probably used all the conservative movie actors that he could find in Hollywood for his movie! Movie comes out on October 3.
 

Speaking of David Zucker, he has produced three great short satires about those that advocate appeasement and higher taxes. Totally hilarious and worth watching!!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

JON VOIGHT: Obama sowing socialist seeds ...

Academy Award winner actor Jon Voight wrote an excellent op-ed in the Washington Times on July 28, 2008. He discussed his beliefs of what will happen to our great country if Obama is elected the president this November. Voight discusses Obama's radical affiliations, discusses his own experience with the anti-war movement during the Vietnam War, and even calls Wesley Clark a "lying fool" for his attack on John McCain's military experience.

It is so rare nowadays to see anyone in Hollywood display conservative values. Here's Jon Voight, actually writing an op-ed piece, and letting the rest of Hollywood know exactly where he stands. And of course, in true liberal fashion, the "powers that be" in Hollywood have already started firing pot shots at Voight. Jeffrey Wells of Hollywood Elsewhere (and Los Angeles Times, Entertainment Weekly) has already suggested that Voight be placed on a "sh*t list." Wells said, "you'd think an arch conservative working in an overwhelmingly liberal town would think about restraining himself for expediency's sake, if nothing else."

There it is, ladies and gentlemen. Liberal hyprocrisy at its best. The so called "progressive" and "open minded" liberals are open minded and lovers of freedom of speech, AS LONG AS the speech comports with their liberal agenda. If the speech does not comport with their liberal agenda, then censorship is perfectly alright. It is just like Hillary Clinton's desire to reintroduce the "fairness doctrine" and force radio stations to broadcast "liberal" opinions to "balance out" the conservative opinions expressed in radio by the likes of Limbaugh, Hannity, and Gallagher. The irony of liberals always accusing conservatives of being narrow minded.

Well, I hope each of us will support Jon Voight's movies as much as possible. Other than Jerry Bruckheimer, I can't think of another Hollywood director with conservative leanings. And be sure to read Voight's op-ed article in the Washington Times. It's excellent. And pass it to your friends and family too.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2008/jul/28/voight/
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »